|
@@ -10,11 +10,285 @@ For this to work the return type of the method must be a `org.reactivestreams.Pu
|
|
|
This is necessary to integrate with Reactor's `Context`.
|
|
|
====
|
|
|
|
|
|
+[[jc-enable-reactive-method-security-authorization-manager]]
|
|
|
+== EnableReactiveMethodSecurity with AuthorizationManager
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+In Spring Security 5.8, we can enable annotation-based security using the `@EnableReactiveMethodSecurity(useAuthorizationManager=true)` annotation on any `@Configuration` instance.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+This improves upon `@EnableReactiveMethodSecurity` in a number of ways. `@EnableReactiveMethodSecurity(useAuthorizationManager=true)`:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+1. Uses the simplified `AuthorizationManager` API instead of metadata sources, config attributes, decision managers, and voters.
|
|
|
+This simplifies reuse and customization.
|
|
|
+2. Supports reactive return types. Note that we are waiting on https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/22462[additional coroutine support from the Spring Framework] before adding coroutine support.
|
|
|
+3. Is built using native Spring AOP, removing abstractions and allowing you to use Spring AOP building blocks to customize
|
|
|
+4. Checks for conflicting annotations to ensure an unambiguous security configuration
|
|
|
+5. Complies with JSR-250
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+[NOTE]
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+For earlier versions, please read about similar support with <<jc-enable-reactive-method-security, @EnableReactiveMethodSecurity>>.
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For example, the following would enable Spring Security's `@PreAuthorize` annotation:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.Method Security Configuration
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+.Java
|
|
|
+[source,java,role="primary"]
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+@EnableReactiveMethodSecurity(useAuthorizationManager=true)
|
|
|
+public class MethodSecurityConfig {
|
|
|
+ // ...
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Adding an annotation to a method (on a class or interface) would then limit the access to that method accordingly.
|
|
|
+Spring Security's native annotation support defines a set of attributes for the method.
|
|
|
+These will be passed to the various method interceptors, like `AuthorizationManagerBeforeReactiveMethodInterceptor`, for it to make the actual decision:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.Method Security Annotation Usage
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+.Java
|
|
|
+[source,java,role="primary"]
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+public interface BankService {
|
|
|
+ @PreAuthorize("hasRole('USER')")
|
|
|
+ Mono<Account> readAccount(Long id);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @PreAuthorize("hasRole('USER')")
|
|
|
+ Flux<Account> findAccounts();
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @PreAuthorize("@func.apply(#account)")
|
|
|
+ Mono<Account> post(Account account, Double amount);
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+In this case `hasRole` refers to the method found in `SecurityExpressionRoot` that gets invoked by the SpEL evaluation engine.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+`@bean` refers to a custom component you have defined, where `apply` can return `Boolean` or `Mono<Boolean>` to indicate the authorization decision.
|
|
|
+A bean like that might look something like this:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.Method Security Reactive Boolean Expression
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+.Java
|
|
|
+[source,java,role="primary"]
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+@Bean
|
|
|
+public Function<Account, Mono<Boolean>> func() {
|
|
|
+ return (account) -> Mono.defer(() -> Mono.just(account.getId().equals(12)));
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+=== Customizing Authorization
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Spring Security's `@PreAuthorize`, `@PostAuthorize`, `@PreFilter`, and `@PostFilter` ship with rich expression-based support.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+[[jc-reactive-method-security-custom-granted-authority-defaults]]
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Also, for role-based authorization, Spring Security adds a default `ROLE_` prefix, which is uses when evaluating expressions like `hasRole`.
|
|
|
+You can configure the authorization rules to use a different prefix by exposing a `GrantedAuthorityDefaults` bean, like so:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.Custom MethodSecurityExpressionHandler
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+.Java
|
|
|
+[source,java,role="primary"]
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+@Bean
|
|
|
+static GrantedAuthorityDefaults grantedAuthorityDefaults() {
|
|
|
+ return new GrantedAuthorityDefaults("MYPREFIX_");
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+[TIP]
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+We expose `GrantedAuthorityDefaults` using a `static` method to ensure that Spring publishes it before it initializes Spring Security's method security `@Configuration` classes
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+[[jc-reactive-method-security-custom-authorization-manager]]
|
|
|
+=== Custom Authorization Managers
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Method authorization is a combination of before- and after-method authorization.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+[NOTE]
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+Before-method authorization is performed before the method is invoked.
|
|
|
+If that authorization denies access, the method is not invoked, and an `AccessDeniedException` is thrown.
|
|
|
+After-method authorization is performed after the method is invoked, but before the method returns to the caller.
|
|
|
+If that authorization denies access, the value is not returned, and an `AccessDeniedException` is thrown
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+To recreate what adding `@EnableReactiveMethodSecurity(useAuthorizationManager=true)` does by default, you would publish the following configuration:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.Full Pre-post Method Security Configuration
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+.Java
|
|
|
+[source,java,role="primary"]
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+@Configuration
|
|
|
+class MethodSecurityConfig {
|
|
|
+ @Bean
|
|
|
+ BeanDefinitionRegistryPostProcessor aopConfig() {
|
|
|
+ return AopConfigUtils::registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @Bean
|
|
|
+ @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
|
|
|
+ PreFilterAuthorizationReactiveMethodInterceptor preFilterInterceptor() {
|
|
|
+ return new PreFilterAuthorizationReactiveMethodInterceptor();
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @Bean
|
|
|
+ @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
|
|
|
+ AuthorizationManagerBeforeReactiveMethodInterceptor preAuthorizeInterceptor() {
|
|
|
+ return AuthorizationManagerBeforeReactiveMethodInterceptor.preAuthorize();
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @Bean
|
|
|
+ @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
|
|
|
+ AuthorizationManagerAfterReactiveMethodInterceptor postAuthorizeInterceptor() {
|
|
|
+ return AuthorizationManagerAfterReactiveMethodInterceptor.postAuthorize();
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @Bean
|
|
|
+ @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
|
|
|
+ PostFilterAuthorizationReactiveMethodInterceptor postFilterInterceptor() {
|
|
|
+ return new PostFilterAuthorizationReactiveMethodInterceptor();
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Notice that Spring Security's method security is built using Spring AOP.
|
|
|
+So, interceptors are invoked based on the order specified.
|
|
|
+This can be customized by calling `setOrder` on the interceptor instances like so:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.Publish Custom Advisor
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+.Java
|
|
|
+[source,java,role="primary"]
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+@Bean
|
|
|
+@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
|
|
|
+Advisor postFilterAuthorizationMethodInterceptor() {
|
|
|
+ PostFilterAuthorizationMethodInterceptor interceptor = new PostFilterAuthorizationReactiveMethodInterceptor();
|
|
|
+ interceptor.setOrder(AuthorizationInterceptorOrders.POST_AUTHORIZE.getOrder() - 1);
|
|
|
+ return interceptor;
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+You may want to only support `@PreAuthorize` in your application, in which case you can do the following:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.Only @PreAuthorize Configuration
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+.Java
|
|
|
+[source,java,role="primary"]
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+@Configuration
|
|
|
+class MethodSecurityConfig {
|
|
|
+ @Bean
|
|
|
+ BeanDefinitionRegistryPostProcessor aopConfig() {
|
|
|
+ return AopConfigUtils::registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @Bean
|
|
|
+ @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
|
|
|
+ Advisor preAuthorize() {
|
|
|
+ return AuthorizationManagerBeforeMethodInterceptor.preAuthorize();
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Or, you may have a custom before-method `ReactiveAuthorizationManager` that you want to add to the list.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+In this case, you will need to tell Spring Security both the `ReactiveAuthorizationManager` and to which methods and classes your authorization manager applies.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Thus, you can configure Spring Security to invoke your `ReactiveAuthorizationManager` in between `@PreAuthorize` and `@PostAuthorize` like so:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.Custom Before Advisor
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.Java
|
|
|
+[source,java,role="primary"]
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+@EnableReactiveMethodSecurity(useAuthorizationManager=true)
|
|
|
+class MethodSecurityConfig {
|
|
|
+ @Bean
|
|
|
+ @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
|
|
|
+ public Advisor customAuthorize() {
|
|
|
+ JdkRegexpMethodPointcut pattern = new JdkRegexpMethodPointcut();
|
|
|
+ pattern.setPattern("org.mycompany.myapp.service.*");
|
|
|
+ ReactiveAuthorizationManager<MethodInvocation> rule = AuthorityAuthorizationManager.isAuthenticated();
|
|
|
+ AuthorizationManagerBeforeReactiveMethodInterceptor interceptor = new AuthorizationManagerBeforeReactiveMethodInterceptor(pattern, rule);
|
|
|
+ interceptor.setOrder(AuthorizationInterceptorsOrder.PRE_AUTHORIZE_ADVISOR_ORDER.getOrder() + 1);
|
|
|
+ return interceptor;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+[TIP]
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+You can place your interceptor in between Spring Security method interceptors using the order constants specified in `AuthorizationInterceptorsOrder`.
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The same can be done for after-method authorization.
|
|
|
+After-method authorization is generally concerned with analysing the return value to verify access.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For example, you might have a method that confirms that the account requested actually belongs to the logged-in user like so:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.@PostAuthorize example
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+.Java
|
|
|
+[source,java,role="primary"]
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+public interface BankService {
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @PreAuthorize("hasRole('USER')")
|
|
|
+ @PostAuthorize("returnObject.owner == authentication.name")
|
|
|
+ Mono<Account> readAccount(Long id);
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+You can supply your own `AuthorizationMethodInterceptor` to customize how access to the return value is evaluated.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For example, if you have your own custom annotation, you can configure it like so:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.Custom After Advisor
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+.Java
|
|
|
+[source,java,role="primary"]
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+@EnableReactiveMethodSecurity(useAuthorizationManager=true)
|
|
|
+class MethodSecurityConfig {
|
|
|
+ @Bean
|
|
|
+ @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
|
|
|
+ public Advisor customAuthorize(ReactiveAuthorizationManager<MethodInvocationResult> rules) {
|
|
|
+ AnnotationMethodMatcher pattern = new AnnotationMethodMatcher(MySecurityAnnotation.class);
|
|
|
+ AuthorizationManagerAfterReactiveMethodInterceptor interceptor = new AuthorizationManagerAfterReactiveMethodInterceptor(pattern, rules);
|
|
|
+ interceptor.setOrder(AuthorizationInterceptorsOrder.POST_AUTHORIZE_ADVISOR_ORDER.getOrder() + 1);
|
|
|
+ return interceptor;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+and it will be invoked after the `@PostAuthorize` interceptor.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+== EnableReactiveMethodSecurity
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
[WARNING]
|
|
|
====
|
|
|
-Method Security also supports Kotlin coroutines, though only to a limited degree.
|
|
|
+`@EnableReactiveMethodSecurity` also supports Kotlin coroutines, though only to a limited degree.
|
|
|
When intercepting coroutines, only the first interceptor participates.
|
|
|
-If any other interceptors are present and come after Spring Security's method security interceptor, they will be skipped.
|
|
|
+If any other interceptors are present and come after Spring Security's method security interceptor, https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/22462[they will be skipped].
|
|
|
====
|
|
|
|
|
|
====
|