|
|
@@ -36,14 +36,14 @@
|
|
|
<h2>History</h2>
|
|
|
<p>Acegi Security started out as a method interceptor for Spring IoC container
|
|
|
managed beans. Typically such beans provide services layer functions.
|
|
|
- Over time Acegi Security grew to offer authentication services, ThreadLocal management,
|
|
|
+ Over time Acegi Security grew to offer authentication services, <code>ThreadLocal</code> management,
|
|
|
web request filtering, extra AOP support,
|
|
|
ACL features, additional authentication mechanisms and so on (for those interested,
|
|
|
- see our <a href="changes-report.html">change log</a>.</p>
|
|
|
+ see our <a href="changes-report.html">change log</a>).</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2>Why Use Spring</h2>
|
|
|
<p>There's plenty written about why the
|
|
|
- <a href="http://www.springframework.com">Spring Framework</a>
|
|
|
+ <a href="http://www.springframework.org">Spring Framework</a>
|
|
|
is a good fit for modern applications. If you're not familiar with the benefits
|
|
|
Spring offers, please take a few minutes to learn more about it. In numerous
|
|
|
situations Spring will save you many months (or even years) of development time.
|
|
|
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
|
|
|
avoid its use by writing equivalent getter, setter and lifecycle invocation processes
|
|
|
in standard Java code. This is a natural consequence of the Spring way of development,
|
|
|
which emphasises framework independence (it is <i>not</i> because we think there are good
|
|
|
- good reasons people would <i>not</i> use Spring).</p>
|
|
|
+ reasons people would <i>not</i> use Spring).</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>If it sounds too hard (it's not) or counter-productive (it is) to replace Spring's IoC
|
|
|
services, don't forget you can always deploy Acegi Security and the Spring
|
|
|
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
|
|
|
<h1>Conclusion</h1>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>In summary, we recommend you take a look at Spring and consider using it in your
|
|
|
- applications. Irrespective of whether you do or not, we strongly recommend you use it
|
|
|
+ applications. Irrespective of whether you do so or not, we strongly recommend you use it
|
|
|
for configuration and lifecycle management of Acegi Security. If that is also not desired,
|
|
|
Acegi Security can easily be executed without Spring at all, providing you implement
|
|
|
similar IoC services. Acegi Security has very minimal dependencies directly on Spring,
|
Ben Alex