|
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
|
|
|
<classname>SecurityContext</classname>. </para>
|
|
|
<para> If you are using the namespace, an instance of
|
|
|
<classname>ProviderManager</classname> is created and maintained internally, and
|
|
|
- you add providers to it by using the namespace authentication provider elements
|
|
|
+ you add providers to it by using the namespace authentication provider elements
|
|
|
(see <link xlink:href="#ns-auth-manager">the namespace chapter</link>). In this
|
|
|
case, you should not declare a <classname>ProviderManager</classname> bean in your
|
|
|
application context. However, if you are not using the namespace then you would declare
|
|
@@ -99,6 +99,28 @@
|
|
|
repository. These will be discussed in more detail <link
|
|
|
xlink:href="core-services-password-encodin">below</link>. </para>
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
+ <section xml:id="core-services-erasing-credentials">
|
|
|
+ <title>Erasing Credentials on Successful Authentication</title>
|
|
|
+ <para>
|
|
|
+ From Spring Security 3.0.3, you can configure the <classname>ProviderManager</classname>
|
|
|
+ will attempt to clear any sensitive credentials information from the
|
|
|
+ <interfacename>Authentication</interfacename> object which is returned by a successful
|
|
|
+ authentication request, to prevent information like passwords being retained longer
|
|
|
+ than necessary. This feature is controlled by the <literal>eraseCredentialsAfterAuthentication</literal>
|
|
|
+ property on <classname>ProviderManager</classname>. It is off by default.
|
|
|
+ See the Javadoc for more information.
|
|
|
+ </para>
|
|
|
+ <para>
|
|
|
+ This may cause issues when you are using a cache of user objects, for example, to
|
|
|
+ improve performance in a stateless application. If the <interfacename>Authentication</interfacename>
|
|
|
+ contains a reference to an object in the cache (such as a <interfacename>UserDetails</interfacename>
|
|
|
+ instance) and this has its credentials removed, then it will no longer be possible to authenticate
|
|
|
+ against the cached value. You need to take this into account if you are using a cache. An obvious
|
|
|
+ solution is to make a copy of the object first, either in the cache implementation or in
|
|
|
+ the <interfacename>AuthenticationProvider</interfacename> which creates the returned
|
|
|
+ <interfacename>Authentication</interfacename> object.
|
|
|
+ </para>
|
|
|
+ </section>
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
<section>
|
|
|
<title><interfacename>UserDetailsService</interfacename> Implementations</title>
|