Browse Source

ant format seems to have reformated these differently than what is in CVS

Colin Sampaleanu 21 years ago
parent
commit
a09f2a4c18

+ 7 - 6
core/src/test/java/org/acegisecurity/MockHttpServletRequest.java

@@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ public class MockHttpServletRequest implements HttpServletRequest {
     //~ Instance fields ========================================================
 
     private HttpSession session;
-    private Map paramMap = new HashMap();
     private Map headersMap = new HashMap();
+    private Map paramMap = new HashMap();
     private Principal principal;
     private String contextPath = "";
     private String queryString = null;
@@ -66,16 +66,17 @@ public class MockHttpServletRequest implements HttpServletRequest {
         this.queryString = queryString;
     }
 
-    private MockHttpServletRequest() {
-        super();
-    }
-
-    public MockHttpServletRequest(Map headers, Principal principal, HttpSession session) {
+    public MockHttpServletRequest(Map headers, Principal principal,
+        HttpSession session) {
         this.headersMap = headers;
         this.principal = principal;
         this.session = session;
     }
 
+    private MockHttpServletRequest() {
+        super();
+    }
+
     //~ Methods ================================================================
 
     public void setAttribute(String arg0, Object arg1) {

+ 2 - 2
core/src/test/java/org/acegisecurity/intercept/web/RegExpBasedFilterDefinitionMapTests.java

@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ import net.sf.acegisecurity.SecurityConfig;
 
 
 /**
- * Tests parts of {@link RegExpBasedFilterInvocationDefinitionMap} not tested by {@link
- * FilterInvocationDefinitionSourceEditorTests}.
+ * Tests parts of {@link RegExpBasedFilterInvocationDefinitionMap} not tested
+ * by {@link FilterInvocationDefinitionSourceEditorTests}.
  *
  * @author Ben Alex
  * @version $Id$

+ 1 - 1
integration-test/src/net/sf/acegisecurity/integrationtests/web/AbstractContactsTests.java

@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ public abstract class AbstractContactsTests extends TestCase {
             contactManager.getRandomContact();
             fail("Should have thrown RemoteAccessException");
         } catch (RemoteAccessException exception) {
-             assertTrue(true);
+            assertTrue(true);
         }
     }
 

+ 2 - 2
samples/contacts/src/main/java/sample/contact/ContactManagerBackend.java

@@ -25,12 +25,12 @@ import java.util.Vector;
 
 /**
  * Backend business object that manages the contacts.
- *
+ * 
  * <P>
  * As a backend, it never faces the public callers. It is always accessed via
  * the {@link ContactManagerFacade}.
  * </p>
- *
+ * 
  * <P>
  * This facade approach is not really necessary in this application, and is
  * done simply to demonstrate granting additional authorities via the

+ 4 - 3
samples/contacts/src/main/java/sample/contact/SecureIndexController.java

@@ -16,8 +16,8 @@
 package sample.contact;
 
 import net.sf.acegisecurity.Authentication;
-import net.sf.acegisecurity.GrantedAuthority;
 import net.sf.acegisecurity.AuthenticationCredentialsNotFoundException;
+import net.sf.acegisecurity.GrantedAuthority;
 import net.sf.acegisecurity.context.ContextHolder;
 import net.sf.acegisecurity.context.SecureContext;
 
@@ -67,10 +67,11 @@ public class SecureIndexController implements Controller, InitializingBean {
     public ModelAndView handleRequest(HttpServletRequest request,
         HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException {
         SecureContext secureContext = ((SecureContext) ContextHolder.getContext());
+
         if (null == secureContext) {
             throw new AuthenticationCredentialsNotFoundException(
-                    "Authentication credentials were not found in the " +
-                    "SecureContext");
+                "Authentication credentials were not found in the "
+                + "SecureContext");
         }
 
         final Authentication currentUser = secureContext.getAuthentication();