|
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
|
|
|
|
+[[servlet-authorization-authorizationfilter]]
|
|
|
|
+= Authorize ServerHttpRequest
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Spring Security provides support for authorizing the incoming HTTP requests.
|
|
|
|
+By default, Spring Security’s authorization will require all requests to be authenticated.
|
|
|
|
+The explicit configuration looks like:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+.All Requests Require Authenticated User
|
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
|
+.Java
|
|
|
|
+[source,java,role="primary"]
|
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
|
+@Bean
|
|
|
|
+SecurityWebFilterChain springSecurityFilterChain(ServerHttpSecurity http) {
|
|
|
|
+ http
|
|
|
|
+ .authorizeExchange(exchanges -> exchanges
|
|
|
|
+ .anyExchange().authenticated()
|
|
|
|
+ )
|
|
|
|
+ .httpBasic(withDefaults())
|
|
|
|
+ .formLogin(withDefaults());
|
|
|
|
+ return http.build();
|
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+.Kotlin
|
|
|
|
+[source,kotlin,role="secondary"]
|
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
|
+@Bean
|
|
|
|
+fun springSecurityFilterChain(http: ServerHttpSecurity): SecurityWebFilterChain {
|
|
|
|
+ return http {
|
|
|
|
+ authorizeExchange {
|
|
|
|
+ authorize(anyExchange, authenticated)
|
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
+ formLogin { }
|
|
|
|
+ httpBasic { }
|
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+We can configure Spring Security to have different rules by adding more rules in order of precedence.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+.Multiple Authorize Requests Rules
|
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
|
+.Java
|
|
|
|
+[source,java,role="primary"]
|
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
|
+import static org.springframework.security.authorization.AuthorityReactiveAuthorizationManager.hasRole;
|
|
|
|
+// ...
|
|
|
|
+@Bean
|
|
|
|
+SecurityWebFilterChain springWebFilterChain(ServerHttpSecurity http) {
|
|
|
|
+ // @formatter:off
|
|
|
|
+ http
|
|
|
|
+ // ...
|
|
|
|
+ .authorizeExchange((authorize) -> authorize // <1>
|
|
|
|
+ .pathMatchers("/resources/**", "/signup", "/about").permitAll() // <2>
|
|
|
|
+ .pathMatchers("/admin/**").hasRole("ADMIN") // <3>
|
|
|
|
+ .pathMatchers("/db/**").access((authentication, context) -> // <4>
|
|
|
|
+ hasRole("ADMIN").check(authentication, context)
|
|
|
|
+ .filter(decision -> !decision.isGranted())
|
|
|
|
+ .switchIfEmpty(hasRole("DBA").check(authentication, context))
|
|
|
|
+ )
|
|
|
|
+ .anyExchange().denyAll() // <5>
|
|
|
|
+ );
|
|
|
|
+ // @formatter:on
|
|
|
|
+ return http.build();
|
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+.Kotlin
|
|
|
|
+[source,kotlin,role="secondary"]
|
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
|
+@Bean
|
|
|
|
+fun springSecurityFilterChain(http: ServerHttpSecurity): SecurityWebFilterChain {
|
|
|
|
+ return http {
|
|
|
|
+ authorizeExchange { // <1>
|
|
|
|
+ authorize(pathMatchers("/resources/**", "/signup", "/about"), permitAll) // <2>
|
|
|
|
+ authorize("/admin/**", hasRole("ADMIN")) // <3>
|
|
|
|
+ authorize("/db/**", { authentication, context -> // <4>
|
|
|
|
+ hasRole("ADMIN").check(authentication, context)
|
|
|
|
+ .filter({ decision -> !decision.isGranted() })
|
|
|
|
+ .switchIfEmpty(hasRole("DBA").check(authentication, context))
|
|
|
|
+ })
|
|
|
|
+ authorize(anyExchange, denyAll) // <5>
|
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
+ // ...
|
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
|
+====
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+<1> There are multiple authorization rules specified.
|
|
|
|
+Each rule is considered in the order they were declared.
|
|
|
|
+<2> We specified multiple URL patterns that any user can access.
|
|
|
|
+Specifically, any user can access a request if the URL starts with "/resources/", equals "/signup", or equals "/about".
|
|
|
|
+<3> Any URL that starts with "/admin/" will be restricted to users who have the authority "ROLE_ADMIN".
|
|
|
|
+You will notice that since we are invoking the `hasRole` method we do not need to specify the "ROLE_" prefix.
|
|
|
|
+<4> Any URL that starts with "/db/" requires the user to have both "ROLE_ADMIN" and "ROLE_DBA".
|
|
|
|
+This demonstrates the flexibility of providing a custom `ReactiveAuthorizationManager` allowing us to implement arbitrary authorization logic.
|
|
|
|
+For simplicity, the sample uses a lambda and delegate to the existing `AuthorityReactiveAuthorizationManager.hasRole` implementation.
|
|
|
|
+However, in a real world situation applications would likely implement the logic in a proper class implementing `ReactiveAuthorizationManager`.
|
|
|
|
+<5> Any URL that has not already been matched on is denied access.
|
|
|
|
+This is a good strategy if you do not want to accidentally forget to update your authorization rules.
|