123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239 |
- [[servlet-httpfirewall]]
- = HttpFirewall
- Spring Security has several areas where patterns you have defined are tested against incoming requests to decide how the request should be handled.
- This occurs when the `FilterChainProxy` decides which filter chain a request should be passed through and when the `FilterSecurityInterceptor` decides which security constraints apply to a request.
- It is important to understand what the mechanism is and what URL value is used when testing against the patterns that you define.
- The servlet specification defines several properties for the `HttpServletRequest` that are accessible via getter methods and that we might want to match against.
- These are the `contextPath`, `servletPath`, `pathInfo`, and `queryString`.
- Spring Security is only interested in securing paths within the application, so the `contextPath` is ignored.
- Unfortunately, the servlet spec does not define exactly what the values of `servletPath` and `pathInfo` contain for a particular request URI.
- For example, each path segment of a URL may contain parameters, as defined in https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt[RFC 2396]
- (You have probably seen this when a browser does not support cookies and the `jsessionid` parameter is appended to the URL after a semicolon.
- However, the RFC allows the presence of these parameters in any path segment of the URL.)
- The Specification does not clearly state whether these should be included in the `servletPath` and `pathInfo` values and the behavior varies between different servlet containers.
- There is a danger that, when an application is deployed in a container that does not strip path parameters from these values, an attacker could add them to the requested URL to cause a pattern match to succeed or fail unexpectedly.
- (The original values will be returned once the request leaves the `FilterChainProxy`, so will still be available to the application.)
- Other variations in the incoming URL are also possible.
- For example, it could contain path-traversal sequences (such as `/../`) or multiple forward slashes (`//`) that could also cause pattern-matches to fail.
- Some containers normalize these out before performing the servlet mapping, but others do not.
- To protect against issues like these, `FilterChainProxy` uses an `HttpFirewall` strategy to check and wrap the request.
- By default, un-normalized requests are automatically rejected, and path parameters and duplicate slashes are removed for matching purposes.
- (So, for example, an original request path of `/secure;hack=1/somefile.html;hack=2` is returned as `/secure/somefile.html`.)
- It is, therefore, essential that a `FilterChainProxy` is used to manage the security filter chain.
- Note that the `servletPath` and `pathInfo` values are decoded by the container, so your application should not have any valid paths that contain semi-colons, as these parts are removed for matching purposes.
- As mentioned earlier, the default strategy is to use Ant-style paths for matching, and this is likely to be the best choice for most users.
- The strategy is implemented in the class `AntPathRequestMatcher`, which uses Spring's `AntPathMatcher` to perform a case-insensitive match of the pattern against the concatenated `servletPath` and `pathInfo`, ignoring the `queryString`.
- If you need a more powerful matching strategy, you can use regular expressions.
- The strategy implementation is then `RegexRequestMatcher`.
- See the {security-api-url}/org/springframework/security/web/util/matcher/RegexRequestMatcher.html[Javadoc for this class] for more information.
- In practice, we recommend that you use method security at your service layer, to control access to your application, rather than rely entirely on the use of security constraints defined at the web-application level.
- URLs change, and it is difficult to take into account all the possible URLs that an application might support and how requests might be manipulated.
- You should restrict yourself to using a few simple Ant paths that are simple to understand.
- Always try to use a "`deny-by-default`" approach, where you have a catch-all wildcard (`/**` or `**`) defined last to deny access.
- Security defined at the service layer is much more robust and harder to bypass, so you should always take advantage of Spring Security's method security options.
- The `HttpFirewall` also prevents https://www.owasp.org/index.php/HTTP_Response_Splitting[HTTP Response Splitting] by rejecting new line characters in the HTTP Response headers.
- By default, the `StrictHttpFirewall` implementation is used.
- This implementation rejects requests that appear to be malicious.
- If it is too strict for your needs, you can customize what types of requests are rejected.
- However, it is important that you do so knowing that this can open your application up to attacks.
- For example, if you wish to use Spring MVC's matrix variables, you could use the following configuration:
- .Allow Matrix Variables
- ====
- .Java
- [source,java,role="primary"]
- ----
- @Bean
- public StrictHttpFirewall httpFirewall() {
- StrictHttpFirewall firewall = new StrictHttpFirewall();
- firewall.setAllowSemicolon(true);
- return firewall;
- }
- ----
- .XML
- [source,xml,role="secondary"]
- ----
- <b:bean id="httpFirewall"
- class="org.springframework.security.web.firewall.StrictHttpFirewall"
- p:allowSemicolon="true"/>
- <http-firewall ref="httpFirewall"/>
- ----
- .Kotlin
- [source,kotlin,role="secondary"]
- ----
- @Bean
- fun httpFirewall(): StrictHttpFirewall {
- val firewall = StrictHttpFirewall()
- firewall.setAllowSemicolon(true)
- return firewall
- }
- ----
- ====
- To protect against https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Cross_Site_Tracing[Cross Site Tracing (XST)] and https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Test_HTTP_Methods_(OTG-CONFIG-006)[HTTP Verb Tampering], the `StrictHttpFirewall` provides an allowed list of valid HTTP methods that are allowed.
- The default valid methods are `DELETE`, `GET`, `HEAD`, `OPTIONS`, `PATCH`, `POST`, and `PUT`.
- If your application needs to modify the valid methods, you can configure a custom `StrictHttpFirewall` bean.
- The following example allows only HTTP `GET` and `POST` methods:
- .Allow Only GET & POST
- ====
- .Java
- [source,java,role="primary"]
- ----
- @Bean
- public StrictHttpFirewall httpFirewall() {
- StrictHttpFirewall firewall = new StrictHttpFirewall();
- firewall.setAllowedHttpMethods(Arrays.asList("GET", "POST"));
- return firewall;
- }
- ----
- .XML
- [source,xml,role="secondary"]
- ----
- <b:bean id="httpFirewall"
- class="org.springframework.security.web.firewall.StrictHttpFirewall"
- p:allowedHttpMethods="GET,HEAD"/>
- <http-firewall ref="httpFirewall"/>
- ----
- .Kotlin
- [source,kotlin,role="secondary"]
- ----
- @Bean
- fun httpFirewall(): StrictHttpFirewall {
- val firewall = StrictHttpFirewall()
- firewall.setAllowedHttpMethods(listOf("GET", "POST"))
- return firewall
- }
- ----
- ====
- [TIP]
- ====
- If you use `new MockHttpServletRequest()`, it currently creates an HTTP method as an empty String (`""`).
- This is an invalid HTTP method and is rejected by Spring Security.
- You can resolve this by replacing it with `new MockHttpServletRequest("GET", "")`.
- See https://jira.spring.io/browse/SPR-16851[SPR_16851] for an issue that requests improving this.
- ====
- If you must allow any HTTP method (not recommended), you can use `StrictHttpFirewall.setUnsafeAllowAnyHttpMethod(true)`.
- Doing so entirely disables validation of the HTTP method.
- [[servlet-httpfirewall-headers-parameters]]
- `StrictHttpFirewall` also checks header names and values and parameter names.
- It requires that each character have a defined code point and not be a control character.
- This requirement can be relaxed or adjusted as necessary by using the following methods:
- * `StrictHttpFirewall#setAllowedHeaderNames(Predicate)`
- * `StrictHttpFirewall#setAllowedHeaderValues(Predicate)`
- * `StrictHttpFirewall#setAllowedParameterNames(Predicate)`
- [NOTE]
- ====
- Parameter values can be also controlled with `setAllowedParameterValues(Predicate)`.
- ====
- For example, to switch off this check, you can wire your `StrictHttpFirewall` with `Predicate` instances that always return `true`:
- .Allow Any Header Name, Header Value, and Parameter Name
- ====
- .Java
- [source,java,role="primary"]
- ----
- @Bean
- public StrictHttpFirewall httpFirewall() {
- StrictHttpFirewall firewall = new StrictHttpFirewall();
- firewall.setAllowedHeaderNames((header) -> true);
- firewall.setAllowedHeaderValues((header) -> true);
- firewall.setAllowedParameterNames((parameter) -> true);
- return firewall;
- }
- ----
- .Kotlin
- [source,kotlin,role="secondary"]
- ----
- @Bean
- fun httpFirewall(): StrictHttpFirewall {
- val firewall = StrictHttpFirewall()
- firewall.setAllowedHeaderNames { true }
- firewall.setAllowedHeaderValues { true }
- firewall.setAllowedParameterNames { true }
- return firewall
- }
- ----
- ====
- Alternatively, there might be a specific value that you need to allow.
- For example, iPhone Xʀ uses a `User-Agent` that includes a character that is not in the ISO-8859-1 charset.
- Due to this fact, some application servers parse this value into two separate characters, the latter being an undefined character.
- You can address this with the `setAllowedHeaderValues` method:
- .Allow Certain User Agents
- ====
- .Java
- [source,java,role="primary"]
- ----
- @Bean
- public StrictHttpFirewall httpFirewall() {
- StrictHttpFirewall firewall = new StrictHttpFirewall();
- Pattern allowed = Pattern.compile("[\\p{IsAssigned}&&[^\\p{IsControl}]]*");
- Pattern userAgent = ...;
- firewall.setAllowedHeaderValues((header) -> allowed.matcher(header).matches() || userAgent.matcher(header).matches());
- return firewall;
- }
- ----
- .Kotlin
- [source,kotlin,role="secondary"]
- ----
- @Bean
- fun httpFirewall(): StrictHttpFirewall {
- val firewall = StrictHttpFirewall()
- val allowed = Pattern.compile("[\\p{IsAssigned}&&[^\\p{IsControl}]]*")
- val userAgent = Pattern.compile(...)
- firewall.setAllowedHeaderValues { allowed.matcher(it).matches() || userAgent.matcher(it).matches() }
- return firewall
- }
- ----
- ====
- In the case of header values, you may instead consider parsing them as UTF-8 at verification time:
- .Parse Headers As UTF-8
- ====
- .Java
- [source,java,role="primary"]
- ----
- firewall.setAllowedHeaderValues((header) -> {
- String parsed = new String(header.getBytes(ISO_8859_1), UTF_8);
- return allowed.matcher(parsed).matches();
- });
- ----
- .Kotlin
- [source,kotlin,role="secondary"]
- ----
- firewall.setAllowedHeaderValues {
- val parsed = String(header.getBytes(ISO_8859_1), UTF_8)
- return allowed.matcher(parsed).matches()
- }
- ----
- ====
|