1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586878889909192939495 |
- <!--
- * ========================================================================
- *
- * Copyright 2005 Acegi Technology Pty Limited
- *
- * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
- * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
- * You may obtain a copy of the License at
- *
- * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
- *
- * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
- * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
- * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
- * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
- * limitations under the License.
- *
- * ========================================================================
- -->
- <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
- <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
- <head>
- <title>Acegi Security Use Without Spring</title>
- <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
- </head>
- <body>
- <h1>Acegi Security Use Without Spring</h1>
-
- <h2>Introduction</h2>
- <p>Sometimes we get asked can Acegi Security be used without Spring.
- This page provides a detailed answer.</p>
-
- <h2>History</h2>
- <p>Acegi Security started out as a method interceptor for Spring IoC container
- managed beans. Typically such beans provide services layer functions.
- Over time Acegi Security grew to offer authentication services, <code>ThreadLocal</code> management,
- web request filtering, extra AOP support,
- ACL features, additional authentication mechanisms and so on (for those interested,
- see our <a href="changes-report.html">change log</a>).</p>
- <h2>Why Use Spring</h2>
- <p>There's plenty written about why the
- <a href="http://www.springframework.org">Spring Framework</a>
- is a good fit for modern applications. If you're not familiar with the benefits
- Spring offers, please take a few minutes to learn more about it. In numerous
- situations Spring will save you many months (or even years) of development time.
- Not to mention your solutions will be better architected
- (designed), better coded (implemented), and better supported (maintained) in the future.
- </p>
-
- <h2>Acegi Security Dependencies on Spring</h2>
- <p>Acegi Security relies on the Spring IoC container to wire its classes, and execute lifecycle
- methods such as <code>afterPropertiesSet()</code>. Some Acegi Security classes also
- publish events to the <code>ApplicationContext</code>, although you could provide a mock
- implementation of <code>ApplicationContext</code> easily enough which no-ops the method.
- In other words, if you particularly didn't want Spring in your application, you <i>could</i>
- avoid its use by writing equivalent getter, setter and lifecycle invocation processes
- in standard Java code. This is a natural consequence of the Spring way of development,
- which emphasises framework independence (it is <i>not</i> because we think there are good
- reasons people would <i>not</i> use Spring).</p>
-
- <p>If it sounds too hard (it's not) or counter-productive (it is) to replace Spring's IoC
- services, don't forget you can always deploy Acegi Security and the Spring
- IoC container solely for configuring Acegi Security. Spring does not mandate its
- use in every part of your application. It will work quite successfully doing nothing more than
- acting as a configuration mechanism for Acegi Security. Whilst some may regard this as excessive,
- it's really no different than the traditional approach of every framework having its very
- own XML or other proprietary configuration system. The main difference is that Spring is an
- actual de facto standard, and you can gradually introduce it to other parts of your application
- over time (if desired).</p>
-
- <p>Acegi Security does <i>not</i> use any other Spring capabilities. Most notably, the
- entire architecture is based around <code>Filter</code>s, not Spring's MVC framework.
- This allows it to be used with any MVC framework, or even with just straight JSPs.
- Acegi Security uses the AOP Alliance and AspectJ interfaces for method interception -
- it does not use any Spring-specific interfaces. As a consequence, Acegi Security is very
- portable to applications that do not leverage <i>any</i> of Spring's capabilities. We should note
- there are several very simple data access objects (DAOs) that use Spring's JDBC abstraction
- layer, although each of these are defined by a simple interface and it is very common in
- even native Spring-powered applications for these to be re-implemented using the application's
- persistence framework of choice (eg Hibernate).
-
- <h1>Conclusion</h1>
-
- <p>In summary, we recommend you take a look at Spring and consider using it in your
- applications. Irrespective of whether you do so or not, we strongly recommend you use it
- for configuration and lifecycle management of Acegi Security. If that is also not desired,
- Acegi Security can easily be executed without Spring at all, providing you implement
- similar IoC services. Acegi Security has very minimal dependencies directly on Spring,
- with it being useful in many non-Spring applications and with non-Spring frameworks.
- </body>
- </html>
|